I'm No Scientist, But Even I Can Tell From The Following Sentence That It's Not High Voltage And Low Voltage:

Para ênfases ainda mais intensas. Versions using strong in sound odd out of context, and i can't, for the moment, work out what their natural context would be. I have a strong background in economics and politics.

嘲讽啊，你真以为外地人不知道大量上海居民住在原拆原建后的 宜川一/四村 这种低品质鸽子房吗？ 就是嘲讽，例如一个智商税，网友们说1888卖给上海人。 你最好真的很有钱，你自己的卡上真的有500万现金，不然这种 沪爷 就是实打实的嘲讽。你又不是企业主的子女，也不是资产实控人，看看你的.

4) a big oak tree was hit by strong winds. Quando e por que usar cada um deles? Are any of these sentences correct?

The Result Of This Is That Breakdown Can Occur At.

Can i say 1) strong knowledge in corporate law?

1) A Big Oak Tree Was Struck By Wind.

3) a big oak tree was struck by strong winds. Are any of these sentences correct? I would say that 3 and 4 are correct.

The Versions Using Good At Are Entirely Natural And Very Common.

Can i say 1) strong knowledge in corporate law? The result of this is that breakdown can occur at. Dizem que o elemento <em>

嘲讽啊，你真以为外地人不知道大量上海居民住在原拆原建后的 宜川一/四村 这种低品质鸽子房吗？ 就是嘲讽，例如一个智商税，网友们说1888卖给上海人。 你最好真的很有钱，你自己的卡上真的有500万现金，不然这种 沪爷 就是实打实的嘲讽。你又不是企业主的子女，也不是资产实控人，看看你的.

Of the two, strong in writing business letters sounds the more odd. 4) a big oak tree was hit by strong winds. Quando e por que usar cada um deles?

2) Deep Knowledge In Corporate Law?

I'm no scientist, but even i can tell from the following sentence that it's not high voltage and low voltage: In the domain of electronics (semiconductors), what is meant by strong current and weak current? I have a strong background in economics and politics.

I Want To Say About Somebody's Good Knowledge In Corporate Law.

Para ênfases ainda mais intensas. 2) a big oak tree was hit by wind. Please, if you can, provide an example of its use.